0:10 Игорь Гофман филигранно раскрывает смысл мироздания через семантику слова \. Блогер Ксения Гофман заявила, что не будет эмигрировать из России.
5-6 причин уважать Игоря Гофмана
| Блогер Игорь Гофман и что с ним сейчас | Потому что блогер, который к нему ходил в 21-ом году не пережил 22-ой года. |
| Кстати о Херсоне. Как дела у Игоря Гофмана? Всё ли в порядке, нужна ли помощь? | 0:10 Игорь Гофман филигранно раскрывает смысл мироздания через семантику слова \. |
| В Тюмени прощаются с блогером-дальнобойщиком КАЛЯН86 | STARHIT | Интервью с Игорем Гофманом 00:02:36 Миша Леонов. |
| Bloger igor gofman i chto s nim seychas | Video | Лев,это Игорь Гофман. |
Гофман жив! Всплыл после многолетнего исчезновения. Интервью с Игорем Гофманом
В 2006 году он окончил Одесский государственный экономический университет по специальности «Менеджмент организации». После получения диплома, Гофман занимался продажами в различных компаниях. Свой первый проект в Интернете он запустил в 2010 году и с тех пор активно развивается в этой сфере. Сегодня Игорь Гофман является одним из ведущих экспертов в области интернет-маркетинга, бизнеса и личной эффективности. Он проводит обучающие курсы, тренинги и консультирует предпринимателей и бизнесменов по всей стране. На его сайте можно найти много полезных материалов и статей по интернет-маркетингу, продвижению бизнеса в сети, созданию сайтов, блогов и онлайн-магазинов. Гофман также активно занимается блогингом и публикует интересные статьи на своем сайте, а также в социальных сетях. Биография Игорь Гофман родился 29 июля 1966 года в Ленинградской области, в городе Пушкин.
Он окончил Ленинградское музыкальное училище имени Римского-Корсакова, а затем продолжил обучение в Ленинградской государственной консерватории имени Римского-Корсакова. В 1990-е годы Игорь Гофман начал свою международную карьеру, выступая с ведущими оркестрами мира, в том числе с Лондонским симфоническим оркестром, Оркестром Филадельфии, Королевским филармоническим оркестром и другими. В 1995 году Игорь Гофман вышел замуж за венгерскую скрипачку Ица Итцеваня, с которой часто выступает на сцене. Они имеют общих детей и регулярно играют вместе как дуэт скрипачей. На сегодняшний день Игорь Гофман продолжает активно выступать на самых престижных концертных площадках мира и является одним из наиболее востребованных скрипачей своего поколения.
Стал известен публике благодаря многочисленным видеороликам и... Просмотры: 15067 Youtube - Домашний меломан Одиннадцать лет американка с одесскими корнями Ольга Штесель не может получать свою собственность — здание,...
Просмотры: 36235 Youtube - DumskayaTV 12 лет назад.
Just like Paul and virtually every other advocate of the lab-leak hypothesis, Dewar seemed to have never even considered the possibility of an American biowarfare attack and was totally unaware of the strong evidence pointing in that direction, such as the secret DIA report in November 2019 or the Crimson Contagion exercise earlier that same year. On a couple of occasions, she briefly mentioned that the Chinese government had suggested that the Covid virus might have been carried to Wuhan by the 300 U. Rand Paul is certainly one of the leading elected officials challenging the establishment position on vaxxing and other Covid public health measures as well as advocating the lab-leak theory. But in reading his long and comprehensive book, I noticed something quite odd. There was absolutely no mention anywhere of Robert F.
Kennedy, Jr. Although they sharply differed on other ideological matters, I regarded them as quite closely aligned on Covid issues, and with Kennedy now being a serious independent candidate for the Presidency, his visibility would only increase. However, the release date was delayed over and over again, and it only finally appeared at the end of 2023. Unfortunately for the author, Covid was no longer a hot topic and the book never seems to have attracted even a fraction of the attention or sales of his previous volume. The explosive issue of biowarfare was the central theme of his book, and just a few months earlier, Kennedy had made some incendiary public remarks at a private dinner that provoked a media firestorm and also revealed himself to be quite credulous on that important topic. Although some of the attacks against him were obviously unfair, a couple of his quotes easily explained the explosive media reaction: COVID-19.
There is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately. And we need to talk about bioweapons. We know the Chinese are spending hundreds of millions of dollars developing ethnically targeted bioweapons, and we are developing ethnic bioweapons. Kennedy was clearly suggesting that Covid may have been developed as an ethnically-targeted bioweapon, aimed at killing white Gentiles and blacks. These are absolutely incendiary statements by a Presidential candidate, far more outrageous than anything Donald Trump ever spouted, and therefore the incident fully warranted the heavy coverage that resulted.
The possible creation of ethnically-targeted bioweapons has been discussed for decades and over the years there have been news reports of major research efforts to develop them. In 2007, Russia discovered that various Western organizations were collecting Russian DNA samples , raising plausible concerns that we were developing ethnic bioweapons aimed at their population. That paper had looked at one particular genetic susceptibility trait involving ACE2 receptors and found that the deleterious variations were fairly common among blacks and white Gentiles while being rare among Latinos, East and South Asians, and Jews. Furthermore, for Covid any ethnic skew in that range would be completely swamped by other factors, especially the impact of age. Anyway, the best means of determining ethnic vulnerability to Covid is to rely upon actual empirical data rather than the ambiguous theoretical arguments of a paper published very early in the outbreak. Kennedy lives in California, and the 39 million residents of his state include enormous numbers of whites, Asians, Latinos, and blacks, with the local government carefully reporting the mortality rates for all of those groups.
It only took me five minutes to locate that data on the Internet and another ten minutes to produce a simple chart showing their relative death rates, stratified by different age ranges. As anyone can see, these real-world mortality statistics are totally different than those suggested by the theoretical research paper that Kennedy had cited. Although the Asian death rate is somewhat lower than that for whites, the difference is not large and is totally negligible across the working-age 18-64-year-old population. The small white-Asian gap could easily be explained by differences in lifestyle, obesity, or cultural factors rather than any genetic difference. Furthermore, the research study had predicted that Latino death rates would be lower than those for whites, but instead they have been far, far higher, especially in the working-age years. Empirical reality always trumps theoretical speculation, and Kennedy should be sharply criticized for never having bothered examining the actual data before expounding his explosive and erroneous claims… Kennedy is a lawyer by training rather than a scientist, and as a non-scientist he probably has an inflated respect for any published scientific paper.
So he casually misconstrued the implications of an academic journal article and never bothered checking his conclusions against easily available public statistics. So the notion that the CIA and our other intelligence agencies are secret allies of the Chinese Communist Party seems a very unrealistic one. Some of the sources Kennedy relies upon for his explosive information are rather doubtful, including the conspiratorial and ferociously anti-PRC Epoch Times , closely affiliated with the Falun Gong religious cult and widely suspected of being funded by the CIA as an anti-China propaganda organ.
Всех вам благ. Примите моё уважение и почтение.
На дураков не обращайте внимание. Их дураков , к сожалению , много. Ваши отзывы об этих блогерах читаю с удовольствием. Вы воспитаны , речь интеллигентна и дипломатична.
Игорь гофман где сейчас
Посмотреть эту публикацию в Instagram Публикация от Mittivine mittivine Как тогда рассказал Фарход Маннонов, он припарковал автомобиль и отошел за кофе, когда вернулся он обнаружил свою разбитую машину. Блогеры, знакомые с Фарход Маннонов лично, поделились в соцсетях своим сочувствием и соболезнованиями в связи с его трагичной смертью. Блогер Улугбек Шодибеков, который также был во многих видео Mittivine, первым выразил свои соболезнования, также и сообщив о смерти Маннонова. Спасибо тебе за все, мы многому научились у тебя. Ты был настоящим лидером, основателем коллектива, опорой в любой ситуации, — написал Шодибеков. Автор канала Troll. Фарход Маннопов был очень открытым, искренним и жизнерадостным человеком. Мы успели попутешествовать вместе.
Цитирую: » «Сказки Гофмана» фр. Следующая статья про самого Теодора Амадея Гофмана выдала ошеломляющую информацию: » Существенный характер поэзии Гофмана… состоит в постоянной внутренней связи и взаимном проникновении фантастического и реального элементов, причем фантастические образы, несмотря на всю свою причудливость, являются не как привидения из иного, чуждого мира, а как другая сторона той же самой действительности, того же самого реального мира, в котором действуют и страдают живые лица, выводимые поэтом. Вследствие этого они или, лучше сказать, поэт — через них — чувствует себя свободным, не привязанным исключительно ни к той, ни к другой области[14]. То есть вы понимаете, да? Игорь Гофман псевдоним?? Возможно, он сфабриковал информацию о своей болезни и лечении в психиатрической клинике. Возможно, он знает что-то, чего не знаем мы.
However, I think Paul may be glossing over some important facts in his account. As I explained in my original April 2020 article : Back in January, few Americans were paying much attention to the early reports of an unusual disease outbreak in the Chinese city of Wuhan, which was hardly a household name. But towards the end of that month, I discovered that the fringes of the Internet were awash with claims that the disease was caused by a Chinese bioweapon accidentally released from that same Wuhan laboratory, with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon and ZeroHedge, a popular right-wing conspiracy-website, playing leading roles in advancing the theory. Indeed, the stories became so widespread in those ideological circles that Sen. Thus, Paul was almost certainly well aware of the widespread early claims among right-wingers that Covid had leaked from the Wuhan lab, but he had apparently dismissed that idea at the time, instead accepting the uniform mainstream media narrative that Covid was a natural virus. So when he later discovered that he had been hoodwinked by a media propaganda-bubble and many of the scientists whose public statements he had taken at face value had privately believed something very different, he naturally reacted by becoming a leading proponent of the lab-leak theory, which he regarded as the only alternative. But as I have repeatedly pointed out , there was actually a third possibility, almost totally ignored by both the mainstream and alternative media: For more than 30 months I have emphasized that there are actually three perfectly plausible hypotheses for the Covid outbreak. The first two possibilities have been very widely discussed and debated across the Western mainstream and alternative media, while the third has been almost totally ignored… Unfortunately, since none of his staffers, colleagues, or media sources had probably ever considered that excluded third possibility, Paul seems to have entirely missed the important early clues that briefly appeared during the first year of the outbreak. Although these items were reported in the mainstream media, they quickly vanished, never to be revisited, and therefore might have been easily missed by anyone not already primed to recognize their significance. So for three years in a row, China had been severely impacted by strange new viral diseases, though only the most recent had been deadly to humans. This evidence was merely circumstantial, but the pattern seemed highly suspicious. As I pointed out at the time, how would Americans react if 300 Chinese military officers had paid an extended visit to Chicago, and soon afterward a mysterious and deadly epidemic had suddenly broken out in that city? Once again, the evidence was merely circumstantial but certainly raised dark suspicions. Most of these early cases had occurred exactly where one might expect, among the East Asian countries bordering China. But by late February Iran had become the second epicenter of the global outbreak. Indeed, Neocon activists on Twitter began gleefully noting that their hated Iranian enemies were now dropping like flies. Let us consider the implications of these facts. Across the entire world the only political elites that have yet suffered any significant human losses have been those of Iran, and they died at a very early stage, before significant outbreaks had even occurred almost anywhere else in the world outside China. Could any rational individual possibly regard this as a mere coincidence? But with the horrific consequences of our own later governmental inaction being obvious, elements within our intelligence agencies have sought to demonstrate that they were not the ones asleep at the switch. Earlier this month, an ABC News story cited four separate government sources to reveal that as far back as late November, a special medical intelligence unit within our Defense Intelligence Agency had produced a report warning that an out-of-control disease epidemic was occurring in the Wuhan area of China, and widely distributed that document throughout the top ranks of our government, warning that steps should be taken to protect US forces based in Asia. After the story aired, a Pentagon spokesman officially denied the existence of that November report, while various other top level government and intelligence officials refused to comment. But a few days later, Israeli television mentioned that in November American intelligence had indeed shared such a report on the Wuhan disease outbreak with its NATO and Israeli allies, thus seeming to independently confirm the complete accuracy of the original ABC News story and its several government sources. It therefore appears that elements of the Defense Intelligence Agency were aware of the deadly viral outbreak in Wuhan more than a month before any officials in the Chinese government itself. Unless our intelligence agencies have pioneered the technology of precognition, I think this may have happened for the same reason that arsonists have the earliest knowledge of future fires. As I explained last week: Soon afterward, I discovered that many of the Covid theories promoted by these right-wing, anti-China activists apparently had their roots in American government propaganda efforts. As early as January 9th, before even a single Covid death had been officially reported, our CIA-associated Radio Free Asia outlet had begun running stories that Covid might be a Chinese bioweapon that had leaked from the Wuhan lab, and a couple of weeks later the right-wing Washington Times picked up on the same story , quoting unnamed U. The Senator apparently worked closely with Kadlec for eighteen months on his committee, relying upon him to investigate the origins of Covid. Despite his strong libertarian principles, Paul holds a seat in the U. Senate as a conservative Republican, so it is only natural that he has absorbed many of the beliefs of his caucus, including their intense demonization of China. But as I pointed out in my original Covid article, that alleged massacre probably never happened and was merely an American propaganda-hoax promoted to vilify China. This demonstrates that the statements of our own government and media should be treated with considerable caution.
Я благодарна Вам за все ваши расклады. Я поняла, что мне надо отпустить мужа. Я больше не хочу быть в треугольнике. Я чувствую их поддержку. Спасибо Вам за Ваш труд, энерг... И завершить с ней отношения в семейном, личном и рабочем контекстах.
Jon Stewart Slams Media for Breathless Trump Trial Coverage | The Daily Show
| Jon Stewart Slams Media for Breathless Trump Trial Coverage | The Daily Show | @igor_gofman_avraalovich. Игорь Гофман. так называемый. 18.3K. |
| НИКОЛАЙ ТУМАНОВ | БЛОГ Telegram канал | Видео-отзыв Игоря. ELMOB-Электромобиль w "Очень хороший видео ролик. |
ИГОРЬ ГОФМАН: ПРОСТОЯЛ У ДВЕРИ 2 ГОДА - ЭТО НОРМАЛЬНО
Игорь Гофман Кто Это фото. Раздел: фото и картинки. На прощании с блогером Дмитрий Радостин прокомментировал слухи о том, что в смерти Николая виновата его зависимость от энергетиков. Игорь Гофман – известный предприниматель и блогер, который начал свою карьеру в. Друг блогера Николая Галенко, известного как КАЛЯН86, рассказал подробности его смерти. Видео-отзыв Игоря. ELMOB-Электромобиль w "Очень хороший видео ролик.
Jon Stewart Slams Media for Breathless Trump Trial Coverage | The Daily Show
| CARI TOGEL > Bandar Toto Togel 4D Situs Togel Online Terpercaya | Игорь Гофман ломает четвертую стену HD. |
| Уличные миры Игоря Гофмана | Подписывайтесь на Telegram-канал "Лента новостей Херсона". |
"Еле дышу. Я на грани". Киборг Игорь Гофман борется с раком горла и нуждается в финансовой помощи
Смотреть видео. Просмотров: 23,593, Длительность: 00:08, Лайков: 843. Игорь Гофман – известный предприниматель и блогер, который начал свою карьеру в Интернете еще весной 2010 года с проекта Статья автора «Домашний меломан» в Дзене: Игорь Гофман — занимательный персонаж.
Игорь гофман мем фото
Закрытый интернет 51:45 - Что нужно завести в Северную Корею, как рухнет железный занавес 59:18 - Идеи для нового мерча 01:02:10 - Алексей Алекстайм Макеев 01:10:31 - Канал Игоря Гофмана 01:19:34 - Конец Еще меня можно найти тут: Телеграм - https. Type 'repeater' between 'youtube' and '.com' and your video will automatically repeat/replay in a loop. Use a mini player without menus or toolbars. Check top repeated videos. По словам Филипа, Игорь Бабушкин пробыл в камере совсем недолго – его отпустили всего лишь через несколько часов. Новости Пикабу Помощь Кодекс Пикабу Реклама О компании. Новости Пикабу Помощь Кодекс Пикабу Реклама О компании. Bloggers. T Steve Sailer / Human Biodiversity.
Запрещенный выпуск по ТВ _Игорь Гофман про Голливуд и Динозавров
August 4, 2023 Игорь Гофман — это известный предприниматель и блогер, который начал свою карьеру в Интернете еще весной 2010 года с проекта Gofman. Его блог стал одним из первых блогов в Украине на тему интернет-маркетинга и бизнеса в сети. Однако, я могу помочь вам найти информацию о нем и вы можете использовать эту информацию для написания статьи. Если вы хотите узнать больше о нем, я могу предоставить ссылки на ресурсы, которые могут быть полезны для вашей статьи.
Но в каждой истории главный герой через жизненные испытания, муки совести обретает духовную свободу. За эту книгу Владимир Николаевич становится лауреатом литературной премии Нижний Новгород. Известный нижегородский писатель Валерий Шамшурин так сказал о нем: «Если вы спросите меня - какую книгу читать всей семьей? Я отвечу - откройте книгу "След облака".
Перед вами предстанет мир бесконечно узнаваемый, но исполненный величия и значения. Вашими собеседниками станут простые русские люди с непростым духовным миром, с умением жить несмотря ни на что и видеть красоту мира. Это очень русская книга». В 2006 году вышла еще одна книга В. Гофмана «Дом — корабль»: рассказы детям о взрослых и взрослым о детях, сразу же ставшая заметным явлением в литературной жизни нижегородского края. В книгу вошли рассказы о детстве, дружбе и верности, доброте и любви — обо всем том, на чем держится мир. Это книга для семейного чтения.
Пронзительная правда жизни, неподдельная любовь автора к каждому своему герою - вот в чем притягательная сила новой книги В.
На третий день пропали и гудки. Я попросил супругу сходить к Коле, постучать. Она сходила — тишина. Никто не открывает, но на кухне горит свет. Это еще больше насторожило, — поделился Дмитрий Радостин, друг Николая Галенко.
Обеспокоенный мужчина поехал к другу сам, как только вернулся из рейса. Он тоже дальнобойщик, как и Николай. Они были близкими друзьями и даже обменялись ключами от квартир. Дмитрий приехал, постучал, попытался открыть дверь ключом, но не смог. Он была закрыта изнутри. Спустился на паркинг, там его машина стоит вся в пыли.
Therefore, vaccinating younger age cohorts was unnecessary and probably dangerously counter-productive considering the significant adverse health risks of a vaccine which was based upon an entirely new biotechnology and had been rushed into release without the unusual lengthy clinical trials. Paul claimed that the vaccination mortality rate was 4 in 10,000, extremely high for any vaccine, and I have no reason to doubt his figures. Obviously, that risk was just a small fraction of the average Covid morality rate of 50 to 100 per 10,000; but that latter figure was very heavily skewed by the elderly, so vaccinating those younger than 50 was probably ill-advised, and even perhaps even those below 60 would have been better off avoiding the jab.
Meanwhile, the widespread pressure for the massive vaxxing and boosting of children made absolutely no logical sense and was probably driven more by ideology, hysteria, and pharmaceutical lobbying than any valid scientific reasoning. Paul also made a strong case that since Covid infections produced far higher levels of antibodies compared to vaccinations there was no reason for vaccinating those who had already gained immunity the natural way. Some of his arguments regarding other public health measures seemed also seemed plausible if not necessarily conclusive.
He argued that masking was completely ineffective since the size of the viral particles was so small relative to the filtration of the mask, but the rejoinder made by proponents at the time was that the viral particles were usually embedded in much larger water droplets and these were successfully filtered out by masks. So the argument became an empirical one and during 2020 and 2021 I remember reading several conflicting studies without personally coming to any solid conclusion. However, the fact that the East Asian countries very heavily emphasized masking and also proved far more successful in controlling their own Covid outbreaks should not be ignored.
Although I felt that they were probably justified during the earliest weeks of the outbreak before the true fatality rates and other factors were well understood, I tended to agree with him that our haphazard and fragmentary lockdowns had little positive impact. In support, he cited some evidence demonstrating that those states most energetically implementing lockdowns fared little better in overall health outcomes than those that followed the opposite policy. But the end result was that most American experienced far greater disruption in their lives than the vast majority of Chinese, while also suffering a death rate roughly three times greater.
So the moral of that story seems to be that effective, Chinese-style lockdowns actually worked quite well, while ineffective American-style lockdowns produced the worst of both worlds, a combination of much more severe social disruption and also far higher death rates. Paul also argued that closing schools made no sense since Covid infections posed little risk to children. But here I would sharply disagree with him since the argument made was students might pick up Covid infections from their classmates and take those home, spreading the virus to their families and perhaps endangering their grandparents or other older relatives.
So the efficacy of closing the schools was merely part of the broader lockdown question. Different individuals focus on different issues. But I think the opposite situation applies with regard to the origin of the Covid virus.
That issue had been my central focus from the very earliest days of the outbreak, while Paul emphasized towards the beginning of his book that he had little interest in that topic and merely followed and apparently accepted the mainstream media coverage for the first 16 months of the epidemic, up until May 2021: I read news reports of scientists that concluded COVID-19 came from animals just like SARS and MERS had. However, I think Paul may be glossing over some important facts in his account. As I explained in my original April 2020 article : Back in January, few Americans were paying much attention to the early reports of an unusual disease outbreak in the Chinese city of Wuhan, which was hardly a household name.
But towards the end of that month, I discovered that the fringes of the Internet were awash with claims that the disease was caused by a Chinese bioweapon accidentally released from that same Wuhan laboratory, with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon and ZeroHedge, a popular right-wing conspiracy-website, playing leading roles in advancing the theory. Indeed, the stories became so widespread in those ideological circles that Sen. Thus, Paul was almost certainly well aware of the widespread early claims among right-wingers that Covid had leaked from the Wuhan lab, but he had apparently dismissed that idea at the time, instead accepting the uniform mainstream media narrative that Covid was a natural virus.
So when he later discovered that he had been hoodwinked by a media propaganda-bubble and many of the scientists whose public statements he had taken at face value had privately believed something very different, he naturally reacted by becoming a leading proponent of the lab-leak theory, which he regarded as the only alternative. But as I have repeatedly pointed out , there was actually a third possibility, almost totally ignored by both the mainstream and alternative media: For more than 30 months I have emphasized that there are actually three perfectly plausible hypotheses for the Covid outbreak. The first two possibilities have been very widely discussed and debated across the Western mainstream and alternative media, while the third has been almost totally ignored… Unfortunately, since none of his staffers, colleagues, or media sources had probably ever considered that excluded third possibility, Paul seems to have entirely missed the important early clues that briefly appeared during the first year of the outbreak.
Although these items were reported in the mainstream media, they quickly vanished, never to be revisited, and therefore might have been easily missed by anyone not already primed to recognize their significance. So for three years in a row, China had been severely impacted by strange new viral diseases, though only the most recent had been deadly to humans. This evidence was merely circumstantial, but the pattern seemed highly suspicious.
As I pointed out at the time, how would Americans react if 300 Chinese military officers had paid an extended visit to Chicago, and soon afterward a mysterious and deadly epidemic had suddenly broken out in that city? Once again, the evidence was merely circumstantial but certainly raised dark suspicions.
Репортаж из квартиры на Пейсах (часть 2)
Потому что блогер, который к нему ходил в 21-ом году не пережил 22-ой года. Bloggers. T Steve Sailer / Human Biodiversity. Игорь (Игал) Авраалович Гофман (1966 — наши дни) — мелкий предприниматель, неудавшийся политик, обладатель двух высших образований, учёный в областях близких к Каббале, семантик по 4 языкам. Лев,это Игорь Гофман. Новости Пикабу Помощь Кодекс Пикабу Реклама О компании. Игорь Гофман – это известный предприниматель и блогер, который начал свою карьеру в Интернете еще весной 2010 года с проекта